Welcome to the Israel Military Forum. You are currently viewing our Israel Forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, Image Forum and access our other features. By joining our Israel Military Forum you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so |
|
Register | FAQ | Pictures | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Movies, Music & Games Forum Movies, Music & Games Forum |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In at least one comic and probably countless war movies the hero takes the pin out of an grenade to arm it by using his teeth....Busted myth see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBus...nade_Hero...so how did this get started?
Well a 1920's movie "The Big Parade" Shows the War hero arming a grenade just this way....probably more dramatic for the auidiance this way..... ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
The maximum effective range of an excuse is zero meters! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I know the feeling. When yet another Napoleon/Waterloo movie came out in 1970 with a great cast, including Rod Stieger and Christopher Plummer,I had great hopes. Then they had to spoil it all by having the pipers attached to Highland regiments play pipe tunes that hadn't even been composed at the time. Some wrong trim on tunics, and incorrect button arrangements, which doesn't bother me, in an otherwise above-average war movie. Stieger played a great fat, dyspeptic, paranoid, worn-out Napoleon. and Plummer did an equally nice job portraying the aristocratic Irishman (usually mistaken as English, as he was a British Army general).
Most Israeli war-themed movies (aside from the older army comedy films!) have some great realism, as most of the actors will have served in the IDF, and may still be doing reserve duty. But how widely Hebrew language films, even with subtitles, are distributed abroad, I don't know. Our war films are never really about the fighting, and very different from US, British and other war films. Israeli war films tend toward the idea that war creates trauma, not heroes, and that victory can be as hard as defeat. And I have noticed unmilitary haircuts in many Hollywood war films! How do you all think of BLACK HAWK DOWN? In a way, I really hope to hear that it was NOT accurate, as it depicts a horrible waste of what were originally motivated, well-trained soldiers. I really hope it was pure Hollywood! But maybe the technical side was good? Last edited by David of Galilee; 10-05-2013 at 08:54 PM.. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Black Hawk Down actually wasn't bad, all things considered. Some of the radio traffic communication was pure nonsense if I recall correctly, but the same problem exists in a lot of Hollywood movies regarding that particular area because military radio operators have their own lingo that wasn't used just to sound cool...this was absolutely necessary to get the message across in the shortest possible time without garbling it. I know because radiotelephone operator was one of my MOS designations and learning to be a good RTO takes time, effort and most of all a great deal of hands-on experience. Just one example of Hollywood ineptitude: Out of the numerous films I despise in the genre depicting the US military in general and especially our involvement in Vietnam, the worst piece of crap ever unleashed on the world was the disgraceful Mel Gibson atrocity We Were Soldiers. To make matters even worse, the individual who wrote the book supposedly acted as an advisor on the film. I'll never forget ranting for weeks about such a steaming pile of dog dung and still angers me to even think about it as I'm writing this. ![]()
__________________
The maximum effective range of an excuse is zero meters! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Shalom Scelli.
Hollywood films and accuracy are most often oxymorons which in a way is kind of fitting as many of those making those films are morons. I find it stunning at just how far from actual events many Hollywood and/or British films are. How about, CHARGE OF THE LIGHT BRIGADE with Errol Flyn whereim the setting of the charge was moved from the Crimea to India? Or ZULU with Michael Caine where the 24th Regiment of Foot was portrayed as a Welsh regiment which it really wasn't at the time of the battle of Roarke's Drift nor was MEN OF HARLECH the regimental song? How about 300? That film had so many inaccuracies in it that it was almost a comedy/fantasy. To start with, when the Spartans broke ranks to do battle? Whenever the Phalanx broke like that in real life it was usually just before their end. If I have even a hope of watching an accurate portrayal of a battle I'll avoid the theatrical films and hope to find a decent documentary on it. Like I said Hollywood and accuracy in war films are oxymorons. Cheers from Peter
__________________
"Next year in Jerusalem!" |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
What a joke.
__________________
The maximum effective range of an excuse is zero meters! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In Black Hawk Down mostly accurate although several of the characters are composites.....
During WW II Doolittle raid of Tokyo was made as "Thirty Seconds over Tokyo" }Ted Lawson who wrote the book was a consultant I think...only goof is having Spencer Tracy as Jimmy Doolittle {Doolittle didnt have that much hair! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
The maximum effective range of an excuse is zero meters! |
Israel Forum |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|