Israel Military Forum

Welcome to the Israel Military Forum. You are currently viewing our Israel Forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, Image Forum and access our other features. By joining our Israel Military Forum you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so
Join Our Israel Community Today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Go Back   Israel Military Forum > Israel National security > Global Military > Europe
Register FAQ Pictures Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Europe Military News from Europe.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-05-2016, 12:43 AM
WABA WABA is online now
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,554
WABA will become famous soon enough
Default Submarines: Context For The Russian Threat

Strategy Page

Submarines: Context For The Russian Threat

May 4, 2016: An American admiral recently remarked that Russian submarine combat patrols had increased 50 percent over 2015.

At least so far. No numbers were given, which is understandable as if the Russians know how accurate your data is they can better discover how you are obtaining it and make that more difficult.

What the U.S. Navy is not talking about is how far behind the Russian submarine force has fallen since the late 1980s.

What is known is that Russia has, since the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, had to cope with military budget cuts of over 80 percent. By the end of the 1990s the Russians began to turn that around but the damage to the mighty “Red Army” of the Cold War was done.

By 1999 Russian armed forces were about 20 percent of their peak Soviet strength. The navy was hurt worst. The main problem was that Russian Navy not only shrunk since 1991 but it has also become much less active.

Since the 1990s fewer and fewer of their nuclear subs went to sea on combat patrols. Most of the boats going to sea were SSNs (attack subs), not ballistic missile equipped SSBNs. Most of these trips were short range training missions, which often lasted a few days, or just a few hours. That was worse than it sounds because the true measure of a fleet is the "combat patrol" or "deployment."

In the U.S. Navy most of these last from 2-6 months. Since 2001 U.S. nuclear subs have carried out ten times as many patrols as their Russian counterparts.

Russia has been trying to turn that around by sacrificing their surface fleet to keep building a few nuclear subs and maintaining the most modern of their nuclear subs in service. But that was done at the expense of training. The nuclear subs rarely went to sea.

Since 2010 that began to change but the dramatic fall in oil prices since 2013 and economic sanctions to punish Russia for attacking Ukraine have cut short plans for upgrading and expanding the nuclear sub fleet. Despite that nuclear subs have been to sea more recently, but by American standards Russian subs are barely visible out there.

The Russian admirals made their big mistake in the early 1990s when the dismantling of the Soviet Union left the second largest fleet in the world with only a fraction of its Cold War budget.

Rather than immediately retire ninety percent of those ships, Russia tried to keep many of them operational. This consumed most of the navy budget and didn't work. There were too many ships, not enough sailors and not enough money for maintenance or training at sea.

By the late 1990s the mighty Soviet fleet was mostly scrap or rusting hulks tied up at crumbling out-of-the way naval bases.

While Western nuclear subs can last for about thirty years Russian models rarely get past twenty.

That means two new SSN or SSGN have to be put into service each year to maintain a force of forty Russian boats. Unless the sub construction budget get billions more dollars a year, that is not going to happen. Right now, the priority is on producing a new class of SSBNs (6 more Boreis are planned or under construction).

These Boreis are essential because they carry SLBMs that provide a critical (they are much harder to destroy in a first strike than land based missiles) portion of the nuclear deterrent.

The rest of the Russian armed forces, like most of the navy, are in sad shape and unable to resist a major invasion.

Only the ICBMs and SLBMs guarantee the safety of the state. So the way things are going now, in a decade or two, Russia will end up with a force consisting of a dozen SSNs and a dozen SSBNs.

Russian surface ships face similar life expectancy problems
Reply With Quote
Israel Forum

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Israel Military Forum